No fakt je, že od Sněmovny lordů je to docela překvapivé. Asi opravdu nějací labourističtí "lordi" udělali své...

No, je to hrozný zklamání. Když už ne Británie, tak kdo, že. Ale situace je již v takovém stádiu, že i kdyby dnes všechny vlády všech členských států tu LS odmítly, beztak bude platit. Parkinsonovy zákony platí.
Což ovšem neznamená, že my, kteří si uvědomujeme souvislosti bychom jim to neměli co nejvíce znepříjemňovat.

Není lord a labourista protimluv? Asi jako soudruh kníže :-)

Sněmovna lordů? Mrkněte se na seznam


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Members_of_the_House_of_Lords

Overyesterday I was watching the Lords doiteds at the parliament television. A couple of dissenters who are still able to speak, mentioned the executory promise of the referendum in Britain and what the public thinks about.

Otherwise the numerous backing of the wedon'tknowhat squawked even - that they are there in the House of Lords still "MUCH MORE DEMOCRATICAL", than some (irresponsible) Irrish voters.

What an egregious gibber!!

Everyone surely knows, that the good half of them are the seniles appointed by Tony Blair to have a better pension - and for it they obediently bootlick to the government. The phrase Lord-labourist is really piteous. It is like if the Clinton would fill half of the US Senate from the social retirement houses for the converted former slave traders and the rest would mold there on hereditary office from the times before the Boston tea party. Both barely able to hold the urine. What a demockracy it would be! It would just need a comrade Sam Webb, Andy Brooks or John Reid as the Lord Chairman.

They were saying there something about the Lisbon treaty Supreme court case in the Czech Rep. though, but what in the Czech Rep. says the president or the chairman of the Senate about the end of the ratification? - of course in the Lords not a word. Such a peanut anyway shouldn't stop the supEUrtrain.

Nevertheless they even looked sometimes they can't hold standing. Some of them generally have had problems to express a coherent sentence. I bet they would in
reward ask Brussels to issue a directive, that next time they could park there with a hospital bed or each have a Lord speaker. The stealth representative of
the Brownvernment EUlogized the Treaty in a manner, that I really suspect Brussels that they xeroxed one truthful text a la digest from 9/11 Ommission report, have translated the fraudulent phrases into all European languages, and distributed it to the eurooptimist bosses - to let them know what they should tell over and over everywhere.

More democratical than the Irish referendum? ... unbelieveable - especially when one considers the polls, where more than half of the British (54%) of course has
thought that the Lords should kill the Treaty and only 14% that they should ratify it. (http://www.openeurope.org.uk/media-centre/...ary.aspx?id=614)

They have ratified it. And this is the better democracy. Vivat Brave New Angsoc!

But for us this means, that the fight is by far not over. If are so pontifical even the co-opted lordships and call themselves a better democracy than the referendum, we are perhaps dealing with an EUpidemy of a contagious dementia - the Czech Supreme court PR-man said yesterday the court maybe wants to judge about the Treaty from text draught from an internet EUjournal, clearly because they still don't have a certified authentic copy of the Treaty (as the Czech govt. and parliament doesn't have as well) - half a year after they signed it! - so it looks it is spread already...
I'm indeed afraid, that it would be good to begin with reboring to the heavier caliber and regrEUtably: to start loading with the international law.